How Many Bill of Materials Do You Need -EBOM, MBOM, SBOM, PBOM…?

Oleg Shilovitsky
Oleg Shilovitsky
13 October, 2022 | 4 min for reading
How Many Bill of Materials Do You Need -EBOM, MBOM, SBOM, PBOM…?

Bill of Materials is the lifeblood of every manufacturing company and product development process. For all companies, a bill of materials is the way to keep information about the product and perform many actions – definition, costing, procurement, maintenance, and many others. While it is clear that the “BOM (bill of materials)” is in the middle of all processes, the discussion about what specific BOM do you need, how information is structured in that BOM, and what should be included or excluded from that BOM is a very complex question. Talking to people in the organization you can find many opinions about how many (Bills of materials) are needed and how to manage them.

Unfortunately, Excel is a common lingua franca for BOMs in many organizations and it creates a lot of complexities and difficulties when managing product information. Let’s speak about some typical situations we can see within companies coming to OpenBOM with help.

Organizational Silos and Multiple BOMs

Usually, the bill of materials is a reflection of organizational silos. This is the most typical way every organization is starting to think about a Bill of Materials – by belonging to a specific group of people focusing on their tasks. This is how companies can easily end up with an engineering bill of materials, manufacturing BOM, production BOM, procurement, and others.

Another (also very typical) way to think about multiple bills of materials is related to the way manufacturing companies are working with other organizations – contractors and sometimes suppliers (especially design suppliers). For many organizations, creating separate BOMs is the way to segregate the data between what can be used in the organizations and outside contractors and design suppliers.

Data Responsibility and Multiple BOMs

Another reason why many companies are ending up with multiple BOMs is partially related to who is responsible for a specific set of information. In such a way, engineers working on mechanical design can easily end up with “mechanical BOM” and engineers developing PCB can create an “electronic BOM”. In complex products, you can sometimes see how separate BOMs are created for different product units and assemblies.

Moving information downstream should put data in the hands of procurement and production planners. In such a way, you can easily get BOMs for OTS (off-the-shelf) parts and custom assemblies. It is very common to see how the procurement team is creating a separate BOM that is used for purchasing only.

From Excel to Information Flow – How Many BOMs Is Needed?

The problem I described above is real and companies are struggling with information spread around in multiple Excels and BOMs. Eventually, companies are looking at how to organize their information (multiple Excels) and the real question that comes up is – how many BOMs are really needed?

There is no universal answer to this question. There are multiple factors that impact the decision of BOM organizations and how information can be managed. Here are some typical factors that can be used to decide:

  1. The manufacturing process (MTP, CTO, ETO)
  2. The complexity of the product and changes
  3. The enterprise system setup

In one of my next articles, I will discuss how to organize Bill of Materials for each of the use cases I described above. Stay tuned…

However, regardless of the number of BOMs you decide to manage, it is absolutely critical to ensure that the Bill of Materials represents a single source of truth about product data and that you organize the mechanism of data synchronization to support keeping the information updated and supporting the flow of information between organizations and multiple functions.

At OpenBOM we are working to provide robust support allowing our customers to manage multiple bills of Materials and share them with the right people in the organization and outside contractors and suppliers. These days we are working on new features to support seamless EBOM-MBOM communication and support for custom BOMs in OpenBOM. Check more about it here – BOM Transformations.

Conclusion

One of the most important functions of every organization is to create a single source of truth for all product structures and related information. Such a strategy eliminates the need to keep dozens (or sometimes even more) of different BOM- excels and send them across your organization’s departments and outside. Having a robust and flexible data management platform such as OpenBOM allows you to forget about how to deal with multiple Excels- OpenBOM allows you to organize all information and instantly share the right subset of data with everyone who needs to consume this information.

REGISTER FOR FREE and start a 14 days trial to see how OpenBOM can help you today.

Best, Oleg

Related Posts

Also on OpenBOM

4 6
26 February, 2026

A change is not an ECO button, it is a connected process. Change management in engineering rarely starts with a...

25 February, 2026

For a long time, managing products meant managing mechanical structures. Assemblies, subassemblies, parts, revisions — the Bill of Materials was...

24 February, 2026

For the third consecutive year, OpenBOM has been recognized in the G2 Top 50 CAD & PLM Software list. When...

24 February, 2026

OpenBOM, a provider of cloud-native Product Data Management (PDM) and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) software, today announced that it has...

23 February, 2026

Recently, my attention was caught by an article from Rob Ferrone explaining the complexity of a BOM. In a nutshell,...

20 February, 2026

Let’s speak about how to turn BOM structure, change history and dependencies into product memory to support intelligent decisions.  Earlier...

19 February, 2026

Do you remember when we paid extra for international and long-distance calls? That model eventually disappeared because technology changed. Pricing...

18 February, 2026

Product development is accelerating and product complexity kills traditional system architecture. Yesterday, my attention was caught by Martin Eigner’s article...

17 February, 2026

A few weeks ago, I participated in a webcast about the future of BOM management with Michael Finocchiaro, Patrick Hillberg...

To the top