How OpenBOM Revision Mechanisms Is Different from Traditional PDM/PLM 

Oleg Shilovitsky
Oleg Shilovitsky
14 March, 2024 | 3 min for reading
How OpenBOM Revision Mechanisms Is Different from Traditional PDM/PLM 

Revision control, an integral part of Product Data Management (PDM) and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems, plays a crucial role in tracking changes and maintaining historical records of product iterations. While the concept isn’t novel, OpenBOM is spearheading a modern approach to revision control, which may seem unconventional at first glance and trigger questions. 

However, if you look at the modern data management and lifecycle control systems (eg. Cloud CAD, GitHub, and some other systems) you will find the reason to redefine revision and change management mechanisms by introducing a concept of collaborative workspace and immutable revision snapshots. 

In this article, we dig into the nuances of OpenBOM’s revision control mechanism and explore why it’s different.

Traditional Revision Control

Traditional revision control typically involves creating independent records for each revision. Commands like “Create a Revision” are straightforward, resulting in the generation of a revision with a designated name or number, often marked as “not released.” This method is common in PDM systems, where revisions are initiated through actions like Check-out/Check-in.

While this approach isn’t inherently flawed, it has its limitations, which prompt the need for reevaluation. The main level of complexity is related to the situation when you need to have the same mechanism to work collaboratively in multiple domains (eg. mechanical, electrical, software, etc). The biggest complexity is to synchronize all events of revision creation and releases. 

Limitations of Existing Methods

The conventional approach assumes upfront revision creation, a model suited for single-CAD/PDM environments. However, with the advent of multidisciplinary structures, where data is generated concurrently across various design domains (mechanical, electronic, software), initiating revisions for each item becomes cumbersome and impractical.

In this evolving landscape, collaborative workflows demand a more flexible and synchronized approach to revision control.

OpenBOM’s Innovative Revision Control

OpenBOM introduces a paradigm shift with its innovative revision control mechanism, anchored by the concept of a “workspace” or “Latest State.” This state allows multiple users to edit, update, and create data simultaneously in real-time without imposing locks.m

OpenBOM “latest” workspace support real time data sharing and automatic change tracking to capture changes that are done by multiple people and applications simultaneously.

The critical departure from traditional methods lies in the process of saving revisions. Instead of predefining revisions, OpenBOM enables users to collaborate seamlessly and initiate revisions only when consensus is reached (“to release”). This dynamic approach ensures that revisions accurately reflect the collective decisions and input of all stakeholders.

Comparison: Old vs. New

In the picture below you can see a high-level comparison between two principles of revision control. On the left – traditional revisions chain, on the right – workspace+revision control. 

  • Flexible Data Organization: OpenBOM’s approach facilitates real-time collaboration and updates, offering a more adaptable framework for data management.
  • Granular Data Access: Users enjoy enhanced visibility and control over revisions, with changes saved only after consensus and formal approval.
  • Streamlined Approval Process: Revisions are initiated post-approval, ensuring that only finalized iterations are archived.

Conclusion

OpenBOM’s modern data management approach empowers engineers and stakeholders to collaborate seamlessly, perform iterative design processes, and review changes in real-time. By embracing a flexible and synchronized workflow, OpenBOM aligns with the demands of contemporary product development strategies, enabling disparate user groups to work independently while remaining interconnected.

Register for free to experience the transformative capabilities of OpenBOM firsthand and unlock the full potential of collaborative product development.

Best regards,

Oleg

Related Posts

Also on OpenBOM

4 6
16 July, 2026

Every engineering and manufacturing team knows why BOMs must be validated before release. Catching a mistake early is cheap. Catching...

15 July, 2026

Welcome to the OpenBOM July 2026 update! The July 2026 update focuses on helping engineering and manufacturing teams improve BOM...

14 July, 2026

Last week, the global PLM community gathered in Lecce, Italy, for the IFIP 23rd International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management...

10 July, 2026

Revisions, Change Requests, and Change Orders in OpenBOM This article is concluding our five days blog series with OpenBOM Product...

9 July, 2026

Ask an engineering team when the BOM is finished and they will point to the release. Ask a purchasing team...

8 July, 2026

On Monday we said that nobody has a BOM problem. On Tuesday we followed a design out of CAD and...

7 July, 2026

There is a button in every CAD system that engineers know well: export BOM to Excel. It feels productive. In...

6 July, 2026

When companies start looking for better tools to manage product information, the conversation usually begins with a very specific pain....

3 July, 2026

Here is a story I hear almost every week. Engineering export the bill of materials (BOM) in Excel. Procurement works...

To the top